Kulamani Biswal Knew How Regulators Think Before He Ever Ran a Power Company’s Finances

In India’s power sector, a company’s income depends heavily on decisions made outside the company. Tariffs for many generators are set by regulators, who decide which costs are justified and which are not. A finance chief who understands that process has a real advantage.

Kulamani Biswal had that advantage early. Before he took charge of finance at a major power company, he had spent years inside the institutions that regulate the sector, and that experience shaped how he later did his job.

His career did not begin there. He joined Coal India Limited in 1985, working in finance at the company that anchors India’s coal production. That gave him a grounding in how a large public-sector enterprise manages its accounts and capital.

The turn toward regulation came in the late 1990s. In 1997 he joined the Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission at Director level. The move put him on the other side of the table, reviewing the submissions that companies make rather than writing them.

The timing matters. State electricity regulators were a new feature of Indian power in the 1990s, created as part of wider reforms to a sector with serious financial problems. Working at one in its early years meant helping to build the practices that later became standard.

In 2004 he moved to the national level. He was appointed Chief (Finance) at the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. That body regulates the tariffs of the central generating companies, a group that includes the largest power producers in the country.

Years in such a role teach habits that are hard to acquire any other way. A regulator learns how a tariff petition is examined, how a company’s claimed costs are tested, and what evidence persuades. Those lessons are useful from the other side too, because they show what a credible financial case looks like.

His contribution in these years was later recognised abroad. In 2015 he was inducted as an honorary Fellow of the World Academy of Productivity Sciences, a recognition that cited his work across the power chain, including the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. The fellowship treats his regulatory service as part of his record, not a footnote to it.

He then returned to company management. In October 2010 he became Director (Finance) at Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, responsible for finance, accounting and corporate governance. It was his first board-level finance role, and it tested his regulatory knowledge in a setting of real commercial responsibility.

His first role running the finances of a power company came in December 2013. He took over as Director (Finance) of NTPC at age 52, with about 28 years of experience in the coal and power sectors. NTPC is the kind of company whose tariffs the central regulator oversees, so his earlier years at the commission were directly relevant.

The environment he walked into rewards that familiarity. A power generator’s borrowing depends on lenders’ confidence in its future earnings, and those earnings rest on a regulatory framework. A finance chief who understands that framework can explain it convincingly and plan around it.

The results at NTPC were notable. The company’s own announcement says its cost of debt fell to 7.81 percent a year under his leadership, a level it said many in the industry would envy. It would be too simple to credit that to his regulatory background alone, but the background is a plausible part of the story.

Recognition followed. He received the “CFO of the Year” award from EPC World, with E&Y as knowledge partner, and in 2015 the “Financial Pride of India” award in the Best Finance Professional category. Both honours reflect the financial results he oversaw.

His influence reached beyond one balance sheet. He served as a non-executive director of PTC India Limited from 2015 to 2017 and chaired NTPC-Tamilnadu Energy Company and Meja Urja Nigam. Those boards gave him a wider view of how regulation affects trading, generation and project finance.

Regulators and regulated companies are often portrayed as adversaries. The more accurate picture is a system in which each side has to understand the other’s constraints. Someone who has worked on both sides knows what a regulator will ask and how a company can answer.

That is the lesson of Kulamani Biswal’s career. His time at the commissions was not a detour from the corporate path but a preparation for it. By the time he ran the finances of a power company, he already knew how the people who judge its numbers think.

Explore more on these topics